February 21, 2008...12:57 am

Thirteen Things I’ve Learned About Conflict Diamonds

Jump to Comments

tt8.gifdiamonds.jpg In my upcoming book (releases August 200 8) “Edge Of The Storm”, Conflict Diamonds make an appearance and continue to lead my characters to the conclusion of the series in “Eye Of The Storm”. Researching this subject has been painful. None of us want to see the starvation and violence that Africa often presents us on television. To know that the solitaire that sparkles on my finger may have contributed to that suffering is hard to take. But stones are not free of their past, even though polishers do their best to grind away the bloodstains.

1. “Blood Diamonds” or “Conflict Diamonds” first got their name during bloodshed and civil war in the Republic Of The Congo That civil war simmered and spit for decades. When the cold war ended and U.S. military support (that was fighting communism) ended, both sides scrambled for diamonds to fund their fighting.

2. Diamonds in the “Conflict Areas” are Alluvial Diamonds.
Rather than the diamonds dug from Kimberlite volcanic tubes (as in South Africa), Diamonds in the Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone and Cote d’Ivoire (formerly The Ivory Coast) are Alluvial Diamonds that have washed up into river beds. More here .

3. The Most Common Visual Association with “Blood Diamonds Happened Due to Voting In Sierra Leone, rebels thirsty for power and violence, cut off hands of those who voted in a fair and free election which was an indictment of the the RUF (Revolutionary United Front). War victims are often seen with their hands and forearms missing. Most of them are located in the diamond rich areas of Sierra Leone.

4. DeBeers Continued to Process Diamonds Coming From Africa Until 1999
Even in the face of mounting violence and bloodshed, the Cartel continued to process diamonds stained with war victim’s blood until the United Nations imposed sanctions. Even then, DeBeers probably continued to process smuggled diamonds in Belgium. I have no idea if the diamond my husband gave me in 1999 is from a conflict zone or not.

5. DeBeers finally lost their grip on the diamond market in the late 90’s when the Australian diamond industry thumbed their noses at them. The Aussie’s rock! They made deals with India to polish their diamonds and weathered the controlling lashing out that DeBeers attempted.

6. Diamonds Are Not Rare
Contrary to popular opinion, Diamonds aren’t rare or even hard to find. DeBeers has been in the business of buying every source of diamonds in the world. It is a true story (depicted in Tom Zoeller’s book “The Heartless Stone”) that diamonds were discovered in the United States. In Arkansas, a mining operation attempted to extract diamonds found on a farm there. DeBeers and the U.S. Government got into a long drawn out legal battle over anti trust laws. The huge diamond cartel buys up the diamonds and controls the flow onto the market. There’s a ton of them but they’re all locked up in DeBeer’s vault in London.

7. Mrs. Arthur “Winnie” Pariker of Dallas found 15.31 carat stone and called it “The Star of Arkansas”. The place where she found them is now a state park.

8. The Tagline “Diamonds Are Forever” was created by Frances Gerety”
The evolution of the advertising campaign of DeBeers is fascinating. It began with the concept to make a diamond forever linked to marriage (which succeeded). They are now aiming it toward women to “buy for themselves”. In their words, “Your first diamond stood for “we”. Let the next one stand for “me”.” Reading how DeBeers has marketed diamonds had me shaking my head.

9. The Civil War in Sierra Leone and the Republic of the Congo ended in 2002
Currently there is a tentative peace in both areas. In the Republic of the Congo, however, the end of hostilities has not ended the violence. Disaffected soldiers and rebels still terrorize local miners. The government has tried to regulate the mining of diamonds, but illicit stones are still on the market. (DeBeers claims on 1% but I doubt this figure)

10. In July of 2007, illicit diamonds were smuggled into Anchorage, Alaska
THIS STORY actually began my search for the origin of conflict diamonds. It’s been a fascinating subject, but very sad.

11. The Cultures That Are Most Devastated by Diamonds, Don’t Value Them
In Sierra Leone, The Republic of the Congo and India (where small boys work as polishers, damaging their eyesight and lungs) diamonds are not valued as mystical, beautiful stones. They are a source of money and that’s all. No one in these country finds them pretty. They think we’re nuts to wear them as jewelry or give them as a promise of marriage.

12. The Smuggling Road Is Hard To Trace
Diamonds go from the Republic of the Congo’s diamond river, to Liberia to Antwerp, Belgium. Although DeBeers has developed The Kimberly Process to legitimize diamonds coming through their hands, it is not full proof.

13. Beauty Is In The Eye of the Beholder
I’ve never been crazy about diamonds. To me, they were cold and hard. But DeBeers has done its work too well. My husband told me he wanted to buy me a diamond big enough to be a “wolf repellent”. Meaning, it was to warn off people who might think a cheaper ring meant they could “steal me away”. (No I never really understood that either). Even now, I stare at my ring and wonder if it started in a muddy river in Sierra Leone and extracted at the point of a gun.
It’s still beautiful, but I can’t see it without wondering.

All of my information has been gathered from Wikepedia, Tom Zoeller’s “The Heartless Stone”,the History Channel’s documentary “Blood Diamonds” and the fabulous Global Witness.

26 Comments

  • Wow! That’s a lot of info - and very interesting too! I’ve always preferred emeralds to diamonds…

    Anyway, just tolet you know, you’ve been tagged.
    http://kellsmurthwaite.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/ive-been-tagged/

  • I’m not a fan of the diamond either. Thanks for this post. Very informative.

  • So fascinating Jen. Except for my wedding ring, I’ve never been a diamond fan. The Cookie knows it too. He comes home with quartz and amber and I oooh and ahhh like you see other women do about their diamonds. To each his own.
    But yeah-the bloody quest for gold and diamonds throughout history is a sad one. Thanks for sharing your research.

  • I prefer art glass, but the movie was good. (if disturbing) Who’d thought Leonardo dicaprio would turn out so well?

  • When I was a child and heard about diamonds, I pictured them as flashing a beautiful rainbow of colors. When Mom showed me the colorless chip in her wedding ring, I was disgusted and have never liked them since. Learning about how those who exploit diamonds have destroyed economies and cultures just makes me dislike them more.

  • Interesting facts!

    *hugs*
    Paige

    My TT is at http://paigetylertheauthor.blogspot.com/

  • Fascinating–and sobering. I remember reading somewhere that other gemstones are rarer, but I can’t remember which ones–rubies, maybe?

    My diamond came from my husband’s grandmother, so at least it’s a couple generations removed from the horror.

  • Thanks for the info, it was really interesting. I have the movie Blood Diamonds on my netflix queue but maybe I should move it up. I always dreamed of getting a big honking diamond when I got engaged. Now I am not so sure.

  • What really irritates me is that the whole “diamond as an engagement ring” is NEW! DeBeers developed a marketing strategy. My Grandmother never would have considered a diamond solitare necessary. My mother did.

  • Interesting post, Jen. I’ve never been a fan of diamonds. To me they’re colorless and cold. I’m all about color. The Blood Diamond movie was sobering - the length they’d go to get the diamonds and the brutality. Very sad.

  • Makes me feel bad my birthstone is a diamond. Interesting list, Jen. I’m looking forward to this next one. I’m not sure I can wait until August. *grin*

  • I learned something new, didn’t know some of this stuff..

    Happy T13

    htpp://www.savannahchase.com/blog

  • I don’t have a diamond ring, just the wedding band. Neither of us is much interested in diamonds. Now I’m glad.

  • This is a great post. I was woefully ignorant about this until I saw “Blood Diamonds,” but I knew that I was not getting the full story, of course.

  • Ah… very informative. Thanks Jenn. I agree - diamonds, at least the ‘clear’ ones, are boring. I’d rather have a colored stone - like an opal or something. Good luck with your research. Sounds interesting. I will have to check out your first book and catch up. Happy TT!

    ~Gwen

  • I remember reading a Sidney Sheldon book years ago that had some setting in the South African diamond mines and I hated them ever since. So when dh wanted to go for the whole Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow ring, I dug in my heels for years and wouldn’t let him. We finally compromised for our 21st wedding anniversary. He bought me the ring, but the stones are Moisannite: stronger and more brilliant than diamonds, a lot less money and no one died for them!

  • You can always go for Canadian diamonds, mined in the arctic. They’re laser marked to identify them as non-conflict diamonds. You can read about it here.

  • Hubby always referred to big diamonds as ‘knuckle draggers’ and vowed to buy me one. I’ve never really been a big diamond fan either. Now I’m REALLY not one :)

  • Great post Jen. I’ve never put attributed much importance to diamonds. Colored stones are much prettier, I think. We could probably buy diamonique off of QVC for a fraction of the cost of real diamonds and very very few people would know the difference as far as I’m concerned…

  • Diamonds aren’t my best friends.

  • Great TT, Jen!
    My engagement ring is an amethyst. It has tiny crumbs of diamonds in it, too–I didn’t know about diamonds’ history back then.
    I’m not a gemstone girl anyway. I like earrings big enough you can feel them swing when you turn your head, so cheaper substances are my friends!
    Funny story:
    My friend Bonnie went to a Christmas party wearing a fairly big sparkly glass ‘jewel’ on a necklace her kids had bought her. Another woman at the party was wearing new diamond earrings, which had cost some huge figure. When she saw Bonnie’s necklace she gasped and said, “Oh my God, how much did that cost?”
    To which Bonnie said, “Two ninety-nine from Claire’s Accessories.”
    I love that the woman wearing a fortune in her ears couldn’t tell the difference between her diamonds and Bonnie’s bit of cheap glass sparkle!
    Immi
    x

  • This is a great post Jen . . . as for the “wolf repellant”, it doesn’t really work, I know from experience. When someone’s heart is moving on, no diamond in the world will keep them there - even if you’ve put them through 4 years of nursing school at the University of Alaska and raised their daughters as your own, the fact that the diamond solitaires you got them for Christmas were twice the size as the ones their girlfriend got them (yeah, not a typo, ummm, complicated) will not keep them . . . I’m just sayin’ . . . .

  • LMAO, Immi!! That’s an awesome story.
    And Steve, you’re absolutely right. So sorry for the ummmm complications.

  • [...] in my gemstones and since my favorite hue is blue, a sapphire wins hands down. Just as an aside, Jennifer McKenzie did a Thursday Thirteen on Blood Diamonds last week that was really [...]

  • omg… how did I miss this?

    Did you know those @#^%*@@s (DeBeers) actually have satellites monitoring their mines to track changes in land formations? Yeah. Theft deterrent. Charming, isn’t it?

    I wonder what they’ll do about that enormous diamond comet floating through space. Probably shoot it down or something.

    Bah. Just… bah.

  • Amen Emma!!! I got a VERY negative view of DeBeers in my research.

Leave a Reply